Hand inspecting map with magnifying glass reflecting financial data for simplified due diligence analysis — Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) is a streamlined process for verifying low-risk customers, allowing businesses to comply with regulations more efficiently.

This guide explains what SDD is, when to use it, and how to implement it properly.

Key Takeaways

Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) streamlines the customer verification process for low-risk clients by allowing for fewer documentation requirements and relying on public information.
A comprehensive risk assessment is essential for determining a customer’s eligibility for SDD, factoring in their business activities, geographic location, and transaction patterns.
Ongoing monitoring and the use of technology are critical for maintaining compliance and adapting SDD measures as the customer's risk profile changes over time.

Understanding Simplified Due Diligence (SDD)

Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) is a streamlined approach for verifying low-risk customers. SDD is widely used in the financial sector to streamline compliance for low-risk clients. It:

Allows businesses to minimise verification requirements while staying compliant
Represents the lowest level of due diligence
Employs less intensive methods to identify and verify customers’ identities

User analysing financial compliance data on a digital dashboard for simplified due diligence review — The principle behind SDD emphasises proportionality, meaning the due diligence measures applied should be commensurate with the assessed risk levels.

In scenarios where the risk of money laundering or terrorist financing is deemed low, SDD allows firms to use fewer documents or rely on public information for customer identity checks.

Entities such as financial institutions and public authorities that maintain transparent identity practices and offer limited financial products often qualify for SDD. Companies listed on a regulated market may be subject to different verification requirements under relevant regulations, such as the MLR 2017. While SDD shares similar requirements with standard due diligence, it operates under a lower threshold, ensuring that the verification process is efficient and proportional to the risk involved for a credit or financial institution.

Criteria for Identifying Low Risk Customers

Identifying low-risk customers is a crucial step in applying Simplified Due Diligence. The assessment considers various factors, including the customer’s business activities and geographical location. For instance, customers operating in jurisdictions with stringent anti-money laundering compliance are often categorised as low risk. SDD is typically suitable for low risk transactions, where the risk of money laundering or terrorist financing is minimal.

Examples of low-risk customers include government entities, companies listed on regulated markets, and financial institutions subject to equivalent AML supervision. Firms must provide a clear justification for classifying a customer as low risk, ensuring that the decision aligns with the broader risk management framework.

When to Apply Simplified Due Diligence

Simplified Due Diligence is applicable when establishing a new business relationship with customers deemed to pose a low risk of financial crime. This includes scenarios where there is a low risk of money laundering, terrorist financing, tax evasion, or other financial crimes. Understanding the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship or transaction is essential for proper risk assessment.

Customer risk levels can change over time, necessitating ongoing re-evaluation. If a customer’s transaction presents patterns change or they begin making larger transactions, they may need to be transitioned to standard customer due diligence. This dynamic assessment ensures that the due diligence measures remain appropriate and effective.

It’s important to note that specific criteria for applying SDD can vary by jurisdiction, reflecting differing regulatory frameworks and risk assessments. Compliance teams must ensure that any scenarios identified as lower-risk are aligned with the broader assessment of money laundering and terrorist financing risks.

Key Steps in the Simplified Due Diligence Process

The Simplified Due Diligence process involves several key steps to ensure that low-risk customers are identified and verified efficiently:

Begin with a thorough customer identification phase.
Obtaining identifying information is a critical part of the customer identification phase to ensure accurate verification.
Use reliable sources to verify the customer’s identity.
Complete verification before establishing a business relationship.

Once the customer is identified, a risk assessment is conducted to determine their eligibility for SDD. Firms then implement simplified verification methods, relying on fewer documents and public information to verify the customer’s identity. These steps help businesses streamline their due diligence processes while ensuring compliance.

In the following subsections, we will delve deeper into the Customer Identification Process, Conducting a Risk Assessment, and Implementing Simplified Verification.

Customer Identification Process

The Customer Identification Process (CIP) marks the initial step of Simplified Due Diligence. Verifying the customer's identity is a core objective at this stage. During this phase, businesses must obtain identifying data to verify clients during the customer onboarding procedure. This involves collecting information such as names, addresses, and other identifying details.

Organisations must ensure the data they collect is accurate. Additionally, verifying this data is important. This accuracy is critical in mitigating risks associated with establishing business relationships. Customer verification should be assessed on a case-by-case basis, ensuring that each customer's identity is verified thoroughly.

Conducting a Risk Assessment

Assessing a customer’s risk profile is crucial to determine their eligibility for simplified due diligence. This initial risk assessment involves examining various risk factors, including the customer’s business activities, geographic risk factors, and transaction patterns. These factors help firms determine whether a customer qualifies for SDD.

Balancing these lower risk factors is essential to maintain compliance and ensure that the simplified due diligence measures are appropriate. Ongoing monitoring and regular business wide risk assessment help businesses adapt their due diligence processes to a risk based approach to evolving customer profiles and emerging risks identified.

Implementing Simplified Verification

For low-risk customers, a simplified identification method and less detailed verification of the customer’s identity can be utilised. Firms can rely on public information and fewer documents for verifying a low-risk customer’s identity, making the process more efficient and less resource-intensive.

The process of verifying the identity of low-risk customers involves simplified approaches that do not compromise on accuracy. Third party beneficial owners for low-risk customers can often be identified without the need for extra documentation, streamlining the verification process for the beneficial owner. Understanding the ownership structure is important for determining the appropriate level of verification, as it helps assess the risk and decide how much scrutiny is necessary.

Differences Between Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) and Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD)

Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) and Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) differ in the following ways:

SDD is less intensive and resource-demanding than EDD.
SDD allows for fewer documents and relies more on public information.
EDD involves stricter scrutiny.
EDD requires ongoing monitoring.

Standard due diligence is typically applied to medium risk customers, who require more scrutiny than low-risk customers but less than high-risk customers. Enhanced due diligence processes are required for high-risk scenarios, such as when dealing with a politically exposed person or a person established in a high-risk third country.

Enhanced Due Diligence measures are necessary for any relevant transaction or business relationship. This is especially true when dealing with a person in a high-risk third country. Identifying politically exposed persons is a key factor in determining when enhanced due diligence is necessary, as these individuals present increased risks for money laundering and terrorist financing. Financial institutions must reevaluate and possibly adopt more rigorous due diligence measures and reasonable measures if a customer’s risk level changes, ensuring that the due diligence process remains appropriate.

Ongoing Monitoring and Compliance

Ongoing monitoring is necessary after Simplified Due Diligence to ensure that the customer continues to qualify as low risk, adjusting due diligence measures as diligence needed. Ongoing monitoring is also required to comply with money laundering regulations, which mandate continuous assessment of customer risk and activity. Conducting regular audits of SDD cases is essential to ensure compliance with established criteria and to identify emerging risks.

Digital system displaying “in progress” status for ongoing compliance monitoring in simplified due diligence — Conducting regular audits of SDD cases ensures the integrity of classification decisions and helps detect emerging risks early. Automated tools can flag anomalies in real time, update risk scores, and prompt escalation to standard or enhanced due diligence if thresholds are crossed.

**Compliance doesn’t end at onboarding. Risk profiles change - and your response must too.**

Speak to an expert

Regularly updating SDD classifications helps prevent potential risks from being overlooked. Automated systems can help maintain updated profiles for customers, reflecting any changes in their risk status promptly. Monitoring should also include identifying politically exposed persons appointed by a community institution or international body, as part of regulatory compliance. This proactive approach ensures that businesses remain compliant and can swiftly adapt to evolving customer profiles.

Effective conducting ongoing monitoring involves screening for adverse media to identify potential risks associated with customers. Regularly reviewing customer classifications helps financial institutions in preventing money laundering and terrorist financing, keeping their due diligence processes robust and effective.

Best Practices for Implementing SDD

Integrating technology can enhance the reliability and speed of the Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) process. Automation of the SDD process not only accelerates customer onboarding but also streamlines due diligence checks, reducing friction for users and ensuring compliance.

Automating the SDD process enhances the efficiency of compliance efforts. This approach allows for a more seamless customer experience while maintaining the necessary due diligence measures to mitigate risks.

Real-World Examples of Simplified Due Diligence

Real-world examples of Simplified Due Diligence illustrate its practical applications and benefits. For instance, businesses processing low-value, standardised transactions, such as utility providers or regulated online service platforms, may apply SDD to eligible customers. This enables faster onboarding with reduced documentary requirements while maintaining compliance.

Another example is a publicly listed entity operating in a low-risk jurisdiction with transparent ownership and a predictable transaction profile. Clients that are subject to equivalent AML supervision may be classified as low-risk following a documented assessment, making them suitable for Simplified Due Diligence under applicable regulations.

The Role of Technology in Simplified Due Diligence

Technology plays a crucial role in enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of Simplified Due Diligence. Automated processes and machine learning can quickly identify customers who meet the eligibility criteria, significantly reducing the time spent on data collection and analysis.

AI-powered tools offer advanced detailed identity verification process capabilities, such as scanning and validating IDs, checking beneficial owners, and performing quick background checks. These digital platforms enhance the accuracy of customer risk assessments, ensuring that the due diligence process remains robust and efficient.

The integration of artificial intelligence in the SDD process helps identify patterns that may indicate potential risks. Leveraging technology allows businesses to rapidly process customer data, improving compliance and operational efficiency within the SDD framework.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Legal and regulatory considerations are paramount when applying Simplified Due Diligence. Firms must justify the rationale for applying SDD measures based on customer risk assessments rather than relying on predefined customer lists. While entities such as those listed on a regulated market may be considered for SDD, eligibility must still be based on an appropriate risk assessment aligned with the latest amendments to the MLR.

Legal professionals must verify the identity of clients using reliable independent sources, such as passports, to comply with regulations. Independent legal professional firms are also required to maintain records of due diligence for a minimum of five years after the conclusion of a business relationship, ensuring that they can provide evidence of compliance if required.

Technological solutions improve compliance tracking by maintaining detailed records of due diligence activities. Solicitors and other legal professionals, including compliance professionals, must satisfy themselves about the source of funds in financial transactions, ensuring that all due diligence measures are met and documented appropriately. The financial action task force emphasises the importance of these practices.

Magnifying glass highlighting legal document on digital interface for simplified due diligence compliance — Modern compliance platforms can **automate documentation**, provide **risk-scoring justification trails**, and **link verification data directly to each case file**, greatly reducing the operational burden on compliance teams and legal professionals. They also enable real-time screening against sanctions lists, adverse media sources, and politically exposed persons, helping firms demonstrate proactive compliance.

**Ready to strengthen your legal defensibility and reduce manual audit stress?**

Request a Demo

Summary

Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) offers a streamlined approach to verifying low-risk customers, ensuring compliance while minimizing resource demands. By understanding the criteria for identifying low-risk customers, the appropriate scenarios for applying SDD, and the key steps in the simplified due diligence process, businesses can effectively implement SDD and maintain compliance.

The integration of technology and ongoing monitoring are crucial to the success of SDD. By adopting best practices and leveraging advanced tools, firms can enhance the efficiency and accuracy of their due diligence measures. As we navigate the complexities of financial compliance, SDD provides a valuable framework for managing low-risk customers efficiently.

Frequently Asked Questions

Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) is a streamlined method for verifying low-risk customers that requires fewer documents and less intensive verification than standard due diligence processes. This approach facilitates easier compliance while still ensuring necessary checks are performed.
Simplified Due Diligence should be applied when engaging with customers assessed as posing a low risk of financial crime, such as money laundering or terrorist financing. This approach allows for reduced scrutiny while maintaining compliance.
Businesses can identify low-risk customers for Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) by analysing factors such as their business activities, geographical location, and transaction patterns, particularly focusing on government entities and publicly-known companies with transparent operations. Implementing this strategic approach ensures effective risk management.
The key difference between Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) and Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) lies in the level of scrutiny applied; SDD is less intensive with minimal documentation, while EDD requires thorough investigations and ongoing monitoring for high-risk customers. Therefore, SDD is suited for low-risk scenarios, whereas EDD is essential for navigating complex risk environments.
Ongoing monitoring is essential in SDD to ensure that customers consistently qualify as low risk, allowing for timely identification of potential risks and prevention of financial crimes through regular audits and updated classifications. This proactive approach mitigates risk effectively.

Comprehensive Guide to Simplified Due Diligence (SDD)

Key Takeaways

Understanding Simplified Due Diligence (SDD)

Criteria for Identifying Low Risk Customers

When to Apply Simplified Due Diligence